Re: CPI2417 - job message queue wrapped

James wrote:

> I've never tried this, but if you change the logging level
> of an active job, does the job log magically change to reflect
> the messages it previously filtered?  Maybe not when displayed,
> but when spooled at job end?

It would appear to in both cases. For example, try compiling the following
CL program and submitting it to batch. It should produce 2 job logs. The
first log does not contain the first message, but the second one contains
both although the first message is sent before the first log is produced.
If you display the job while it is on the 1st delay you will also see that
there is no job log information. If you do the same thing on the second
delay you will see both messages in the log.

pgm
    chgjob     LOG(0 00 *MSG)
    sndpgmmsg  ('This message sent with log level 0') +
                 TOPGMQ(*ext)
    dlyjob     10
    dspjoblog  OUTPUT(*print)
    chgjob     LOG(1 00 *MSG)
    sndpgmmsg  ('This message sent with log level 1') +
                 TOPGMQ(*ext)
    dlyjob     12
endpgm

> If not, it would make more sense to me if job message queues
> behaved more like data queues in that the message is deleted
> upon receipt by the message filter/job log creation process.

That doesn't necessarily sound like a good idea. A program might still want
to be able to retrieve the messages at some point even if they were
filtered from the log.


Dave...
               _________  ,___o
             __________   _\ <;_
           ___________   (_)/ (_)       http://www.twickenhamcc.co.uk
=======================================================
The opinions expressed in this communication are my own and do not
necessarily reflect those of my employer.