|
John wrote: > The argument of which OS is more secure presupposes that > security is something you can buy from the factory, and > then just happily live under. In Richard Feynman's autobiography there is a wonderful account of an enormous safe in the office of a top manager on the Manhattan Project at Los Alamos. Everyone on the project who had paper to file had a personal cabinet with a combination lock. But this manager decided that his papers were more important than other people's and so he made a big show of having this huge safe installed. Unfortunately he left the project without passing on the combination. This didn't matter, however, as it turned out that he had never changed the combination from the factory default so the locksmith was able to open it within seconds. Dave... _________ ,___o __________ _\ <;_ ___________ (_)/ (_) http://www.twickenhamcc.co.uk ======================================================= The opinions expressed in this communication are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of my employer.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.