John, you make a good point.

John Myers - MM wrote:

> I don't know that the big fuss is over this ... he's telling that
> audience
> what they want to hear ...  he probably got a ton of applause from the
> group ...

Correct. "The Market" has long been crying that "open standards" are
what is wanted. IBM is trying to put themselves on that side of the
aisle. I'm sure there will be people who point out that Microsoft
products are proprietary. So this is posturing.

But I wouldn't get too concerned over what guys are saying here. You'll
notice that the same guys who will post "Bye Bye OS/400" at this
announcement are the ones who would have said exactly the same thing if
Z had said IBM's strategy was to go proprietary ("as soon as IBM says
it's strategic, it's dead").

There are people who don't look at what happens, they just twist every
bit of news to try to match it with the view they already have.

> John
>
> John Myers

--
Chris Rehm
javadisciple@earthlink.net

Beloved, let us love one another: for love is of God; and every one
that loveth is born of God, and knoweth God. 1 John 4:7





As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.