No, I said that I'm sure that people will point out that Microsoft is proprietary. In other words, I am sure that this is a part of the reason for IBM's posturing. By casting themselves in the light of "open systems" and pointing out that Microsoft is proprietary, they are likely to be able to build some favor in the market. Well, maybe. Adam Lang wrote: >He said the next thing you know, people will be calling MS proprietary too. > >Sort of made it sound like they shouldn't be called that. > >90% of everything we use everyday can probably fall under the proprietary >label. Proprietary is just another buzzword ... like "legacy". > >Adam Lang >Systems Engineer >Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company >http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > -- Chris Rehm firstname.lastname@example.org Beloved, let us love one another: for love is of God; and every one that loveth is born of God, and knoweth God. 1 John 4:7
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.