I just thought how I should have phrased this question: "Ya know, my former employer upgraded their machine a couple years ago, due to extra processing for 400 to *nix conversion. They were a $500M company running on a F70 (CPW around 60)." "Prior to that, they had some Exx with CPW of 20... So I know you can do a lot with just a few CPW...! (User's thought they were in 'hawg heaven' after the upgrade..." "But... I was just curious"... jt | -----Original Message----- | From: email@example.com | [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On Behalf Of Pat Barber | Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 4:42 PM | To: email@example.com | Subject: Re: 18 CPW? (was RE: V5R1M0 and you...) | | | They are "many" 18cpw or less installed and you would be surprised | at what they are capable of doing. I suspect the lower end 170's | far outnumber almost all other machines. | | A 9402-400(first risc) is perfectly capable of running 50 terminals, | 2-3 remote sites and any number of printers without breaking a major | sweat. | | I know that "more" is better, but not always. I have several customers | with "lower end" machines that do just fine..... | | | jt wrote: | | > Was this a typo...?!? | > | > If not, what model machine is that? I don't know how to say | this without | > sounding insulting...: But what do you use this box for. | >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.