You wrote, "IBM should prevent the backwards compatibility libs getting into

Ya...  I'd say I agree with that...!  Can users implement this through
security if IBM doesn't.  RVKOBJAUT, but then you need a program that
adopts, to run compiles...  Kludge...?  (Which I pronounce kloooodge...;-)


| -----Original Message-----
| From:
| []On Behalf Of
| Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 11:32 PM
| To:
| Subject: Modify SYSVAL QSYSLIBL
| >I have not done this but I wonder what happens if
| >I modify QSYSLIBL to put QSYSV4R4M0 at the top,
| >on an OS at V4R5.   Warning do not be tempted to try.
| >Frank Kolmann
| >>DON'T DO IT.  QSYSV4R4M0 is a library provided for *PRV compilations
| only.
| >>Al
| >>Al Barsa, Jr.
| >I, and I'm sure Jerry too, agree completely.
| >
| >Didn't catch the REASON behind the question...  Maybe there's another way
| to
| >accomplish this, via LPAR.  But don't know the original problem that was
| >being addressed.
| >
| >jt
| I dont have a reason as such. One of our programmers
| modified a jobs *LIBL (system portion) with CHGSYSLIBL.
| Could not even do a SYS REQ cancel, or SIGNOFF.
| It is simply something that is very easy to do and
| I suspect will disable the AS400.
| IBM should prevent the backwards compatibility libs
| getting into the SYSLIBL.
| Frank Kolmann

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.