|
Richard, one quick question: are you doing this for performance reasons? That is, are you caching data in order to avoid doing reads on the file? If not, I'd be interested to know why you are doing this, since it can cause maintenance headaches down the road - you must change the program if the number of entries ever exceeds the size of your array. If you *are* doing this for performance, will there be a significant number of times when you get a "miss" rather than a "hit"? If the answer is yes, you might want to "backload" the arrays; this can substantially reduce your processing time. Let me know and I'll go into this a little further. Joe > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Reeve > > Thanks to all who responded. This list is certainly a > life saver. > > Happy Holidays to all. > > Rich
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.