> From: jt > > But these days, especially in the area of a pure > batch processing, CPW is A WHOLE LOT cheaper than it was when n-tier was > accepted as the CW... And that's my point. In fact, that's always been the point. Let a machine do whatever it is the machine is best at. The 400 is best at database processing. The workstation is best at UI. Let them each do what they are best at. Separate the layers of your application so that each can be deployed where the best fit is. This is why I think interconnectivity is the key to future application design. You know, both the AS/400 and the workstation are already n-tier machines. The AS/400 has a multitude of subprocessors (which is the reason it runs rings around other servers). But even your workstation uses a distributed architecture. Your graphics card has an onboard chip is basically another CPU. Your network card has a processor, so does your SCSI interface. The idea of using each machine to its best potential is hardly new, and the trend is increasing. I may be totally offbase here, but I am willing to wager that there will be a higher rather than lower percentage of 400's being used as pure server machines (as opposed to all-in-one processors) as time goes on, and this, in my mind, is the best use of the machine. Joe Pluta www.plutabrothers.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.