Re: BRMS-Can it speed up our save?

[Portal39@xxxxxxx]

--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
In a message dated 11/23/2001 7:22:14 PM Eastern Standard Time,
blarkin@wt.net writes:


> Subj: Re: BRMS-Can it speed up our save?
> Date: 11/23/2001 7:22:14 PM Eastern Standard Time
> From:    blarkin@wt.net (Bob Larkin)
> Sender:    midrange-l-admin@midrange.com
> Reply-to: <A HREF="mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com">midrange-l@midrange.com</A>
> To:    midrange-l@midrange.com
>
>
>
>
> BRMS can cut down on the clock time. I do not think you can use parralel
> saves
> on the SAVSYS, but you can on the NONSYS. To really save time, you can save
> Domino databases while active. We have 6 Domino Servers per system, and back
> them up through three seperate control groups, all running concurrently. We
> save servers A,B,E,F in one control group, Server C, in another, and Server
> D
> in the third control group. All these saves are done with Domino active,
> saves
> start at 6pm, and are finished by midnite. Single threading, it would run
> till
> past 6am. It is possible to further decrease time by using the incremental
> save
> for Domino.
>
> We use 3590E drives with the K series tapes, 6 drives in one 3494 library.
> No
> operator intervention required during the saves, all tape movement out of
> the
> 3494 is handled during morning shift.
>
> Bob
> rob@dekko.com wrote:
>
>

BRMS has  one  hell of a  learning curve

A. Ports