|
Don, I don't like this trend, either... Nor do I understand the necessity... Are the processors THAT different...? Best thing about the 38 was that (IIRC) you could run CPF 8.0 on a B-model. Processors may have been more-or-less identical back then, though. Haven't read _Inside the AS/400_ by Dr. Soltis. Maybe the advance in technology makes it less feasible to support old hardware... I dunno... I'm skeptical, though, because of IBM's choice not to enhance DDS. I don't believe it would be that costly to implement new keywords to provide access to the new technologies found in V5 SQL. ICBW... But because I don't think it'd be costly for them to enhance DDS, and they just choose not to in order to "force" the market into a desired direction.. Well, I can't help but wonder if this is the same principle being applied, and that's what keeps old hardware from running newer releases. Can only guess at these things.. because those cost numbers will never see the light of day... I may be overly optimistic, but I'm hoping this dropping of old hardware is more of a marketing-"ploy".. (In addition to being a method of driving revenues.) jt > -----Original Message----- > From: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com > [mailto:midrange-l-admin@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Don > Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 9:22 PM > To: midrange-l@midrange.com > Subject: Re: Upgrading V4R5 --> V5R1 > > > > > I'm curious which model they're gonna drop with the 5.2 announcement... > > I just don't like this trend... > > > > On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Glenn Ericson wrote: > > > -- > > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > > This is not the official announcement but an official IBM URL that > > states this. > > > http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/iseries/support/planning/futu > rehdwr.html > > > > At 09:58 PM 11/21/2001 -0500, Oludare wrote: > > >Could you direct me to the IBM announcement that refers to model 510. > > > > > >Thanks > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > >From: "Glenn Ericson" <Glenn-Ericson@att.net> > > >To: <midrange-l@midrange.com> > > >Cc: "Oludare" <oludare@ix.netcom.com> > > >Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 7:19 PM > > >Subject: Re: Upgrading V4R5 --> V5R1 > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > > > > At 06:51 PM 11/21/2001 -0500, "Oludare" wrote: > > > > > > > > >Hi guys, > > > > > > > > > >I'm upgrading my OS, should I be concern about hardware or software > > > > >compatibility. I currently have a 9406-510 2144. > > > > > > > > > >Thanks > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > AS/400 Models 436, 40S, 500, 510, 530, 50S, 53S are not planned > > > > to be supported by OS/400 releases after V5R1. > > > > > > > > Glenn > > > > ________________________ > > > > Glenn Ericson, > > > > Phoenix Consulting LLC , New York , NY USA > > > > Ph.(718)898 9805 Fx .(718)446 1150 > > > > mailto:Glenn-Ericson@att.net
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.