|
On 8 Nov 2001 thomas@inorbit.com wrote: > Understood, agreed, all well and good, etc., etc. But that still evades > the question that was asked which was what's the difference to the > customer between a software and a hardware limitation? Neither cost nor > effect would be different (assuming precise engineering of course). The > limitation would exist either way. So, ??? Does it actually matter what > the mechanism is? Yes. The small customer says, "Slower, smaller capacity hardware is cheaper to produce. Those lower prices should mean I pay less for the machine. I am getting screwed if I have to pay for high-powered hardware that is then artificially slowed." The big customer says, "I paid a premium for high-performance. My expensive machine has the same hardware capacity as the inexpensive machine. Why don't I get a lower price if the same hardware can be sold more cheaply? I am getting screwed!" James Rich james@eaerich.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.