|
Brad, >1. Besides the fact that it's the "norm", what reasons are >given for the need to price software on a tierred level? To make it affordable to a wider range of customers. If priced uniformly, the averaged cost would be cost prohibitive for the small guy. >2. Does the software for a larger machine require more >coding, support etc. to make up for the difference? Depends on the product, but it is not unreasonable to expect more support issues with 1000 concurrent users than with 10. >3. What other industries tier their pricing for the SAME >product? (ie gas costs the same for a ferrari and a tempo). Try government taxation. :) If the business makes more money, Uncle Scam wants a bigger share. Same with King Louie. BTW, gas *does* cost more for my Northstar engine than for a Ford Tempo... Doug
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
