× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
TigerTools may have come up with an interesting sleight-of-hand, but IBM is
an intellectual property company and IBM knows how to protect its assets.  I
doubt there is any iSeries technology (including the functionality of CFINT)
not protected by several clauses and phrases in customer licensing
documents.  What’s the difference between Tiger Tools and tweaking the
Capacity-On-Demand function?  Any IT person installing even the demo version
exposes him and his employer to unpleasant legal consequences, and that IT
person is a fool to take the risk without the blessing of his organization’s
senior management and legal counsel.

Doesn’t anybody find it interesting that the author of Fast400 remains (to
chooses to be) unnamed?

There are a lot of people on this list with a remarkable amount of technical
knowledge, but don’t let your pocket protectors get in the way: this is a
business issue.  IBM’s explicit pricing of interactive features indicates
their intent to sell that capacity; making interactive programs look like
batch programs in an effort to circumvent a known and agreed-to (in the
contracts) restriction is not the same as making interactive programs run
faster in the same (interactive) mode.

IBM has a long history of selling capacity; it goes back to the high-speed
and low-speed switch on System/3 5440 disk drives (and likely before that).
This is no different than software pricing by processor groups except
somebody’s found a way to get around the restriction.

I hope the clowns jumping for joy over Fast400 don’t screw it up for the
rest of us willing to pay for interactive capacity.  If they can’t
cost-justify iSeries because their applications aren’t continuing to provide
increasing value, try the NT and System/36 paths.

IBM’s business practices?  Yes, they suck, and that’s the way it is.  Is
this a surprise to anybody with any experience as an IBM customer?  But we
encounter the same mind-bending frustrations with First Union Bank, or
Charles Schwab, or the IRS, or the City of Tampa meter maid department, or
nearly every other organization.  Vote with your wallet!

The iSeries isn’t overpriced, it’s sub-functional.  Okay, maybe a _little_
overpriced…

Reeve Fritchman
Transportation Technology Group, Inc.
4915 S. Westshore Boulevard
Tampa, Florida 33611
813-831-8574 (voice)
800-NEED-LTL (voice)
813-832-6391 (fax)
reeve@transtechgroup.com <mailto:reeve@transtechgroup.com>  (e-mail)
reeve@ltl400.com <mailto:reeve@ltl400.com>  (e-mail)

--



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.