Re: Zero interactive CPW

["Bernd Schaefers" <bschaefers@xxxxxxx>]

Hi Justin,

I didn't know exactly what to expect either when we ordered a 270_2252_1516
(950/0 CPW). I have not experienced any problems with interactive adminstrative
tasks so far. Sometimes we have 2 or 3 interactive sessions active. Each one
doing a little something, like WRKACTJOB, EDTF, SQLUTIL or compile CLPs w/o
problems. Of course you can't do interactive monster queries etc., you will get
a message in QSYSOPR telling you to cool it.

Best,
Bernd

----- Original Message -----
From: "Haase, Justin C." <Justin.Haase@Kingland.com>
To: <midrange-l@midrange.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 9:17 PM
Subject: Zero interactive CPW


> Folks,
>
> We're looking at a couple systems, 270s, processor FC 2432.  This is the
> 1070 batch with a 1516 or 1519 interactive.  The 1516 is zero interactive,
> 1519 is 50.  Question is this:  how much actual "administration" can you do
> with the supposed zero interactive rating?  If you signon, do a wrkactjob,
> press F10 once - are you going to destroy the machine?  Or can you do
> restores (in batch of course), FTPs, etc w/o making it go casters up?  Any
> known experience with this would be great.  Thanks.
>
> Justin C. Haase
> Midrange Systems Engineer - Kingland Systems Corporation
> 1401 - 6th Avenue South - Clear Lake, IA 50428 USA
> IBM Certified AS/400 Systems Administrator
> Microsoft Certified Professional
> e-mail - justin.haase@kingland.com
> www.kingland.com
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>