|
Yes, I've had this problem. Once it was a hub that functioned in every other environment, and the other time it was a Cable/DSL router that functioned in every other environment. When I first ran into the problem we had just upgraded to V4R5 and I put two and two together and called IBM. I don't remember the specifics but the way they explained it to me convinced me that it was a hub or router on the LAN (actually anywhere between the PC and the LAN the AS/400 is on) and not the AS/400. Swapping the devices out solved the problem. Note: The devices weren't faulty. Swapping them for the same brand/model did not solve the problem. I had to swap them with a different brand. Unfortunately I don't recall the old hub brand but the new brand is from 3Com. The Cable/DSL router that didn't work was from LinkSys and the one that works is from Netgear. > However, even if it is a network congestion problem, why would PC5250 be > dropping, when all other network services are able to ride out the storm? I think this is because the as/400 stops getting a response from the PC and closes the connection. The PC, however, isn't aware of this and continues to display the screen until you press a key. Then the PC sends data to the as/400 and then finds the connection no longer exists. Phil > -----Original Message----- > From: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com > [mailto:midrange-l-admin@midrange.com]On Behalf Of John Taylor > Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 2:14 PM > To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com > Subject: Client Access Session Drops > > > > We're experiencing the same maddening problem with PC5250 that others here > have reported. Namely, the random session disconnects from PC's > at a remote > location. The locations are connected via a speedy 4Mbps DSL line > with very > low network utilization, so I don't think the problem lies there. > QINACTITV > = *NONE, so it's not that. > > I've been on site once when this occurred, and I did notice that > a PING from > the PC that lost a session would result in a lot of dropped packets and > overall sluggish performance, even on the same subnet. This seems to > indicate some type of network congestion problem, but it clears up too > quickly for me to get a sniffer going. Of course, if I leave a sniffer in > place actively collecting data, everything runs flawlessly. > > However, even if it is a network congestion problem, why would PC5250 be > dropping, when all other network services are able to ride out the storm? > Since PC5250 is provided by the Telnet servers, I suspected the keep alive > timeout value (TIMMRKTIMO), which is set to *CALC. Unfortunately, > I haven't > found a way to determine what value the system has actually calculated. > There doesn't seem to be an Display equivalent to the CHGTELNA command. > > Has anyone made any progress on this particular problem? > > > John Taylor > > > _______________________________________________ > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) > mailing list > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. > _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.