|
Without speaking for Al, I think he refers to the fact that it has often been reported in the past that the AS/400 division of IBM is more profitable than other parts of IBM. If this were a separate business it would have a higher tax liability. Instead, the margin of the AS/400 division is blended with the lower margin divisions and IBM's overall margin is more "industry average." I do not know how this would compare with the growing services sector. I also don't know if the AS/400 division gets to report its services income as its own or whether or not AS/400 and iSeries services are just a part of IBM Services. Often, IBM income from one source is not easy to find. The same thing happened in the OS/2 days. One IBM exec was quoted as saying, "For every $1 spent on OS/2, IBM receives another $3 in additional sales and services." in response to industry remarks that OS/2 wasn't a money maker for IBM (since retail sales were only a break even on investment). I copied this quote from an IBM press release off their web site. A few weeks later, when I wanted to share the press release with someone, I went back and could not find it. I emailed the exec and he responded that he couldn't comment and that if I needed other information I would need to contact xxxxxxx in public relations. He was nice enough to give me the email address, but she was not nice enough to respond to my query about this release. So I guess you can't really tell how much revenue a product generates because of its own sales. I mean, how much consulting revenue is generated for every $1 spent on an AS/400? How much in maintenance? The latter would be particularly important, since that revenue is generated for years to come. How many add on sales does IBM get that it would not have seen otherwise? In other words, does IBM see additional hardware sales in AS/400 shops simply because those customers keep IBM on their preferred vendor list when they shop for routers/printers/whatever? How many small shops just call IBM and say, "I want to do x." rather than bidding alternate solutions? Chris Rehm javadisciple@earthlink.net If you believe that the best technology wins the marketplace, you haven't been paying attention. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Prowak, Dave" <DProwak@ci.syracuse.ny.us> To: <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 8:48 AM Subject: RE: The demise of Midrange Computing - Is AS/400 is dead ? > > IBM keeps it a secret to minimize their tax liability. > Huh? Care to explain? > +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.