|
Ken, I heard Neil comment on the situation, I _didn't_ hear him call for legislation. Frankly, other than this being the end of an era (the jobs of some really good people, and perhaps the threats against David for the midrange dot com domain name), I'm thinking that the shutdown of "MC" was a long time coming. Most of my clients, what few even bother to subscribe to platform-specific magazines these days, subscribed to NEWS/400 rather than MC. To tell the truth, IMHO, _BOTH_ of these magazines deserved to go out of business a long time ago. Why? Oh, let me count the ways... 1. Numero Uno, The Big One, El Presidente, "What, are you stupid?" -- They are (were) _OUTRAGEOUSLY_ expensive! What other magazine (especially considering that magazines derive most of their income from advertising) could you _POSSIBLY_ subscribe to for more than $100 US per year that reaches so few people? None, zippo, nada. Heck, I can't get _RID_ of the _FREE_ magazines that I receive that contain more content than "News/400" and "MC" put together -- my circulation boosts their advertising dollars. 2. As mentioned earlier, the web. Who needs a technical magazine when they can get the latest "tips and techniques" on any one of the forums hosted at midrange dot com? Let alone the dozens of other forums available? All of the AS/400 manuals, including Redbooks, at a glance? 3. Unsolicited advertisements. Not to blame these periodicals entirely, _ALL_ magazines sell every piece of information that they have on you to the highest bidder -- BUT, I don't like paying that kind of money annually to be sold to the highest bidder. Just like those cute T-shirts and stress balls that _USED_ to be free at COMMON now cost you a swipe of your card, I'll buy my own before being subjected to 48 million faxes, junk mails, and phone calls. JMHO, Dean Asmussen Enterprise Systems Consulting, Inc. Fuquay-Varina, NC USA E-mail: DAsmussen@aol.com "Miracles happen to those who believe in them." -- Bernard Berenson In a message dated 7/30/01 8:21:22 PM US Eastern Standard Time, kjs@idirect.com writes: > You're right, the compensation packages for key corporate players > should definetely be legislated, and not left to the whims of corporate > lawyers. > Their, 'competitive' salary crap doesn't cut it. > There is no co-incidence, when the outgoing CEO of Nortel left with his > $200m severance package, that one month later 5000 workers hit the > street. > The number of fully qualified people, that would gladly take the job > for even a pittance of that figure. > I don't understand why, but I'm willing to bet the corporate lawyers > get a very big slice of the greed pie. > > Neil Palmer wrote: > > > > Chuck, > > > > especially if some key members of the board of directors are > > planning on leaving soon and want to raise the share price before they > > cash in the ridiculously large stash of shares they have been given for > > meeting mediocre performance targets that should just be considered part > > of their job in the first place - for which they are usually grossly > > overpaid anyway) let's be fair here. +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.