Re: wrksysval QPFRADJ

[Neil Palmer <neilp@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Separate batch jobs into a separate storage pool, and give it a lower 
priority (i.e. higher number) than Interactive.

...Neil





Richard Rosenbluth <rose400@pacbell.net>
Sent by: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com
2001/07/26 21:26
Please respond to MIDRANGE-L

 
        To:     MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
        cc: 
        Subject:        Re: wrksysval QPFRADJ


OK, so the default is for *MACHINE and *BASE Priority 1, and all other
pools Priority 2.

Would we return to the tuning behavior we were used to by changing *BASE
to Priority 2 and *INTERACT to Priority 1?

Thanks.
-- 
Richard Rosenbluth
Rose Information Management Co
mailto:rose400@pacbell.net


Neil Palmer wrote:
> 
> WRKSHRPOOL, F11 - check priority.
> 
> ...Neil
> 
> Richard Rosenbluth <rose400@pacbell.net>
> Sent by: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com
> 2001/07/25 20:01
> Please respond to MIDRANGE-L
> 
> 
>         To:     MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
>         cc:
>         Subject:        Re: wrksysval QPFRADJ
> 
> Does anyone know if the performance algorithm has changed either in V4R5
> or for 820 versus older hardware?
> 
> We have been running a 620 with QPFRADJ at 3 for several years, with
> great results.  We installed V4R5 and did not notice any change in the
> way the system tuned itself.  Last weekend we upgraded to an 820. Now
> the system seems to give preference for memory to batch jobs over
> interactive jobs.
>




+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---