|
The other problem I see with that is this. Would your company give it's product away to another to improve it and sell it as a competing product? I think not, unless you are open source. It wouldn't happen, MS1 would have WindowsXP, MS2 would have to build one from scratch. Granted they might be able to create a similar product quite quickly, but actually designing something new? At first I would have _loved_ to see M$ split up, but now I realize that there are problems related to that. For one, you still have Windows, the number one OS in the US, and you still have Office, the number one office product in the US. Where is the competition in that? Honestly, I think in a couple years Linux or Unix will finally have a commercial quality product for the x86 platform which will hurt MS badly. So for a punishment, I would stab MS a couple times with a knife (because slaps don't teach lessons) and let them go. "Let the best product win!" Mike Wills IT Corporate Support MNWills@taylorcorp.com -----Original Message----- From: Chris Rehm [mailto:javadisciple@earthlink.net] Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 2:52 PM To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com Subject: Re: no Java in XP Windows > ***What I'm suggesting is two companies that start with the same code > base.*** Just split them up in two teams (ie companies). Let them > duke it > out, and given the carnivarous atmosphere at M$, you would probably > see some > amazing innovation. Therefore, more money for Bill Gates and his > shareholders. Well, I wouldn't expect to see the same philosophy as you see now. After all, both companies are Bill and his shareholders, right? So when they got into a price war with each other and shaved their margins, it wold be less money for them, right? After all, just because there are now two companies doesn't mean there is suddenly twice the market to chase after. Also, while this solution might be great for the guy who wants to buy an "all Microsoft" solution, it doesn't do anything for anyone who wants there to be a market in which other companies can innovate and make money. Netscape would not likely be able to bundle with either of the two companies. Instead, we'd just have lower cost bundles of MS products. Unless, of course, the two new companies didn't bother to drop their prices, knowing that the market still has no choice but to deal with one or the other of them. > jJt Chris Rehm javadisciple@earthlink.net If you believe that the best technology wins the marketplace, you haven't been paying attention. +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. To | subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. To | unsubscribe from this list send email to | MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. Questions should be directed to the | list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +--- +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.