× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: NT vs AS/400
  • From: "Nathan M. Andelin" <nathanma@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 20:04:42 -0600

> From: "John Taylor" <john.taylor@telusplanet.net>

> So why does the same 8GB drive cost $300
> on xSeries, and over $4000 on iSeries?

> This is one of the main reasons that we run separate NT
> servers instead of the integrated card - the disk is just too
> expensive. It's also the reason that our webserving isn't done
> on the iSeries.

That's true.  We have more favorable to say for Rochester when we're
considering Windows vs. OS/400, rather than iSeries  vs. xSeries.  And that
was the premise of Avi's original post.  Rochester may have priced itself
out of the file server, print server, web server, mail server, and
communication server markets.  And in my mind, that's a big mistake, because
it ultimately encroaches into the database and business application server
markets.  But if we switch gears, and focus on integrating Web technologies
with business data - that's where the iSeries has an opportunity to strut
its stuff.

For example, we could talk about the close coupling of ILE languages and
record level database access.  That proven combination leads to the most
functional, best performing, most fault tolerant applications.  Contrast
that with an ODBC or similar connection to the database.  We could talk
about the productivity of ILE languages and supporting tools.  I have a lot
of experience with Windows based software development, and I can
unequivocally say that I and my peers have been less productive with Windows
based languages and tools.  We could talk about application deployment
across multiple hardware tiers vs. hosting applications on a single server.
The former leads to extra requirements, a need for multiple skill sets,
increased complexity, less reliability, extra systems management, and poorer
performance.

These are but a few points.  So, while it's unfortunate that Rochester has
priced itself out of some significant markets, I think there's a future for
iSeries in the Web Application Server market.

Nathan.


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.