|
Hi Mid-Range, Thanks for all the excellent responses about backing up and objects missing.. Please bear with me while I work on the followup ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The save is in the job scheduler, but I have some problems cause seems only the compiled pgm was kept for the CL, it looks like.. (is there some sought of cross-library search for a source name.. .. one fella said DSPOBJ but that didn't work..... assistance here ?... poked around a few CMD menus but didn't find such a thing.. a little raw on looking for CMD's)... assume the source would be in a QCLSRC file .. ? ...if saved.. I may end up taking the save out of of job scheduler for the time being and maybe even just putting it in OCL for the time being .. either way I may want to use a save that allows file sharing as I don't want the pain of killing user application jobs, varying off,etc .. unless there is a simple way to do that..... (I am really still non-functional on CL :-) ... and this overnight stuff alone is not sufficient reason to spend a lot of time on it.... Now some followup questions .. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Phil Direct the output to a file. ..... Schmuel (will do, thanks for any CL save) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Claire And the AS/400 doesn't tell you when it skips objects during backup, unlike the System 36. You could do object precheck, or look at the joblog, however the real issue is probably making sure all jobs are ended before the backup starts. Schmuel (see below for the first part, I wonder if you agree with Jeff) agree that the big issue is how to make sure the save is complete... well i was just told by a compatriot that there is a AS/400 CMD allows file sharing.. that might resolve this problem.. to find the save and put that parameter in.... .. I can probably find it thru the menus, but help here is always appreciated... the alternative for the QS36F Save file would be to use the old SAVE individual files command (either by hand or by a utility) from OCL, that allows shared mode ... even if I end up saving the data files twice in the same night .. (once in AS/400 full save and once in OCL mode) .. that leads to another question, other than my program libraries and QS36F what other libs would be significant (only special activity is Domino doing light email and nothing else...) .... btw we have a 170 Rel 4.4. Is this a sensible question to ask.. why repetitively back up all the non-dynamic stuff .. I think our 2.5 gig tape is ok for now, but ultimately that might be a space question as well ... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jeff. I beg to differ. I have never run a backup but that OS/400 has told me each and every object that was not saved. Escape messages are sent. <snip> Schmuel Understood, thanks..., tho my problem is not really knowing what was not saved (because of shared usage skipping over it seems) but doing a save where I KNOW that the data files are saved.. Thanks for the extra insight ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Chuck If you find that objects are "missing" from your tape I suggest checking the job log of the backup job. It is most likely that the objects were in use when the save was performed and they were not saved. If your backup job does not create a job log I would suggest changing the logging level of the job to (4 00 *SECLVL). I can't tell you where to make this change w/o knowing how the backup job is submitted (IBM job scheduler, manaully, etc.) I personally have never seen an IBM save skip objects unless they were in use. Schmuel .. ok.. got it :-) and agreed.. probably somebody left an inquiry program up that night or something.... we never knew that that was unkosher, of course the folks who set up the CL overnight also Y2K'd inaccurately tons of date fields that never needed to be touched .. :-) for which they received mucho denaro.. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Thank you Buck and Al Barsa, too.. thanks Al also for the phone help and the Toolkit info.. made some headway after tawkin to ya... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Alister Wm Macintyre I save S/36 objects to one tape from within S/36 on OS/400 because even though save-all 400 supposedly saves all, some S/36 objects are not valid OS/400 objects & I am a bit paranoid about that. Schmuel Hmmm.. now that is interesting.. and if you could expound more fully as to the type of objects or why that is, I would appreciate... I am seriously considering OCL'ing my save, using SAVE OCL for QS36F ... do you save some other AS/400 libraries from within OCL using CL commands ? info on your modus operandi greatly appreciated.. (I have no problem using WAIT command and OCL to emulate a scheduler) Alister There is a manual specific to people who doing both SSP & OS/400 stuff which has nice charts like <snip> There is also a slim manual for ordinary users Schmuel And these manuals would be available from ? my local IBM office .. ? It seems we do have the original manuals with the system .. I have one 3rd party book with some cross-reference info, but it is sorta rudimentary Alister We no longer need this because we have menu options with WRKSBMJOB & WRKSPLF & etc. wrapped up so user takes menu option to see what is status of their jobs & why the printer is not doing their reports etc. <snip> Schmuel Ahh.. .. could use some CL savvy to do same.. or a nice little library of such commands... (another words.. you set up a little utility menu for the user that is a little more helpful than simply the raw op system ..?) Alister On OS/400 command line GO SAVE and GO Backup takes you to a lot of stuff ... Go Backup is not advised any more ... GO RESTORE options should match menu item for menu item what is on GO SAVE. K. Alister There is a free IBM wall poster that charts what is in each GO SAVE option. Schmuel Kewl.. hmmm.. are we registered with IBM, current .. have to check.. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Thanks again to everybody :-) +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.