Re: Performance of SNDDST vs QtmmSendMail

Maybe I am misunderstanding you but it is not the speed of sending that is 
the point - I am trying to reduce the overhead on the 400 so everything else 
doesn't slow to a crawl.  We have no third party utilities and management 
does not want to spend any money on them.  The Lan is not an option either 
as it is pretty much maxxed out. (again - no intentions of upgrading the 
Lan).


>From: rob@dekko.com
>Reply-To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
>To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
>Subject: Re: Performance of SNDDST vs QtmmSendMail
>Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 12:53:12 -0500
>
>
>Interesting question.  Impressive volume.  This would certainly take some
>volume testing.  And then you'd have to ensure that your version of
>QtmmSendMail was optimized for speed.  Meaning if you're just calling a
>utility, (not knocking anyone here, really), like SNDEMAIL, then this may
>not be optimized for your situation.  Then who would want a flood of emails
>in a test?  Let's see, if there was a 1 second difference between 20
>SNDDST's and 20 QtmmSendMail's then (30,000 / 20) =1,500 seconds per hour
>or 25 minutes per hour difference in your volume.  I see your dillemma
>here.  Sorry, but I don't have the time right now to code a time trial.
>
>Rob Berendt
>
>==================
>Remember the Cole!
>
>
>
>                     "M Jull"
>                     <fcsltd@hotmail.com        To:     
>MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
>                     >                          cc:
>                     Sent by:                   Subject:     Performance of 
>SNDDST vs QtmmSendMail
>                     owner-midrange-l@mi
>                     drange.com
>
>
>                     05/16/01 12:03 PM
>                     Please respond to
>                     MIDRANGE-L
>
>
>
>
>
>
>At my current job there are emails that need to be sent to the internet
>from
>CL and RPG programs (mostly CL's right now) and these emails can have a
>frequency of 30,000 per hour (sometimes more).  Which method of sending
>will
>be quicker (less overhead on the AS/400) - SNDDST or QtmmSendMail?  Some of
>
>the emails are custom written and some are system generated 'Generic'
>letters.
>
>Currently this is being (mis)handled by SNDNETSPLF commands....which causes
>
>the 720 to slow down considerably.  None of the emails are MIME format -
>they are just TXT files kept in a folder.  This may be a future requirement
>
>(to use MIME or html docs) however.
>
>Thanks for any and all advice.
>
>Marilyn Jull
>Alcas Corp.
>_________________________________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
>+---
>| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
>| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
>| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
>| To unsubscribe from this list send email to
>MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
>| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
>david@midrange.com
>+---
>
>
>
>
>+---
>| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
>| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
>| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
>| To unsubscribe from this list send email to 
>MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
>| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: 
>david@midrange.com
>+---

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---