Performance of SNDDST vs QtmmSendMail

At my current job there are emails that need to be sent to the internet from 
CL and RPG programs (mostly CL's right now) and these emails can have a 
frequency of 30,000 per hour (sometimes more).  Which method of sending will 
be quicker (less overhead on the AS/400) - SNDDST or QtmmSendMail?  Some of 
the emails are custom written and some are system generated 'Generic' 
letters.

Currently this is being (mis)handled by SNDNETSPLF commands....which causes 
the 720 to slow down considerably.  None of the emails are MIME format - 
they are just TXT files kept in a folder.  This may be a future requirement 
(to use MIME or html docs) however.

Thanks for any and all advice.

Marilyn Jull
Alcas Corp.
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---