Re: RE: Thin Clients and TCP/IP

["Mike Naughton" <mnaughton@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Dale,

Thanks for the suggestion about system values.

I'm not sure what you're getting at when you ask about  limiting device
sessions (probably my ignorance!). We use named devices -- for various
reasons, that makes sense for us. Is there a way for a named device to
have more than one session? If I did this, wouldn't the system tend to
build up unnecessary extra sessions if the unused ones keep hanging around?

Thanks!

MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com writes:
>Now, as to your current problem, maybe you can tinker with some of the
>*inact* system values reducing them so that the device belongs to a
>re-booted system is knocked off by the system? Do you really require need
>to
>limit the device sessions to only one though? That is the root of this
>problem no?


Mike Naughton
Senior Programmer/Analyst
Judd Wire, Inc.
124 Turnpike Road
Turners Falls, MA  01376
413-863-4357 x444
mnaughton@juddwire.com

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---