|
Not having had any extensive experience with data queues, I thought I have seen where they are used for this type of thing. Using the data queue method, does the system console still need to be signed on for it to work? And, therefore, still requiring restricted access to the system console? I see your point, though, with it offering more flexibility for scheduling. It also allows for a remote administrator (like myself) to hold or reschedule the scheduled job in case the branch needs to operate past the normally scheduled time. I like it! - Dan Dan Bale says "Ban Dale!" IT - AS/400 Handleman Company 248-362-4400 Ext. 4952 D.Bale@Handleman.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -------------------------- Original Message -------------------------- Dan Can't speak for Robot or whatever, and I use the same method as you have historically used. A strategy I have seen suggested at various times and one which BRMS appears to use (from what I've seen of it) is to have a console job signed on that waits on a data queue. When something is recieved on the data queue then something happens. (DUH!) In this case it runs the system (or other) save and as its signed on at the console, it is able to run a SAVSYS. The job that sends the data queue entry could be on the scheduler or wherever, giving a tad more flexibility than the DLYJOB option. Hope this helps Regards Evan Harris >Does anyone know if the 3rd party backup products do anything more than stick >a DLYJOB RSMTIME(&TIME) before it does the SAVE 21 stuff? I did this years >ago where the system console was in a locked room for which only the MIS >manager & myself had a key. Every afternoon I'd load the next day's backup >tape in the tape drive, call up a special menu on the system console, take the >option. The first thing it did was to INZTAP the tape, this was also a sanity >check that the drive was "ready". I walked out of the computer room and >locked the door. Then it hit a DLYJOB RSMTIME(020000) before ENDSBS *ALL and >running all of the SAVe commands. > >Not knowing any better to do otherwise, my method requires restricted access >to the system console. Do the 3rd party backup products do it any better than >that? > >Dan Bale >IT - AS/400 >Handleman Company >248-362-4400 Ext. 4952 >D.Bale@Handleman.com > Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. > (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) > >-------------------------- Original Message -------------------------- > > I would like to be able to schedule a job to run a full > > system backup. Is this possible? > >Not really, as the full system save runs in restricted state. > >Some 3rd party backup products (Robot/Save is the one that comes to mind) >provides support to schedule a full system save. I think you have to run a >backup agent on your console and it checks the time and takes the system >into restricted state prior to trying to run a full system save. > >david +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.