|
Brad, you definitely need to lighten up. It's in no way a personal attack for me to say that e-RPG is rigid compared to OO technology. Go to your archives, if you want. You were dissing Java as a language while asking basic questions on how to use it. I told you to write some code before you dissed the language, and you told me to get off my high horse. As to my opinion on e-RPG, as a veteran of over 20 years of RPG programming, I am definitely entitled to an opinion as to whether RPG is suited for developing HTML applications. And my opinion is that it's not. Java is better for vector and string manipulation than RPG, even RPG IV, and is far better for the sorts of OO techniques that make designing widgets easy. Techniques such as Decorator classes, which you are busily asking about (and I am just as busily answering) on JAVA400-L. You ask my help there and then call me out here. No, an informed decision doesn't provoke a response on JAVA400-L. You get whapped on JAVA400-L when you post things like, "Also, Java doesn't solve these problems, which is why it is more theory that reality," while at the same time you're asking basic questions like, "how would I declare FILENAME as static final?". Dissing without paying dues. I hate that. And so I did a little whapping! WHEEEE! Joe > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com > [mailto:owner-midrange-l@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Stone, Brad V (TC) > Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 3:38 PM > To: 'MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com' > Subject: RE: Web apps on the AS/400 > > > > e-RPG provides fast development at the price of > > a rather rigid architecture. Or else why would the author of > > e-RPG be "tinkering" with Java? > > > > ;) > > First, just because I wrote a book on e-RPG doesn't mean that that is the > only technology I will use. Just wait for my Java book for e-RPG > programmers. :) Hitting stores in late 2002, just when people > will want to > start tinkering. <bg> > > Second, "rigid" is your opinion and point of view. > > Lastley, if more Java folks should play with e-RPG. Taking an application > and duplicating it across both technologies would show it's not as "rigid" > as some think. (Hello World applications don't count as "I have done > e-RPG".) > > Did I take the comment too serious? Yes. Why? If the roles > were reversed > and I posted something like this on the Java list, even with a winking > smiley, I know I'd get the **ADMIN WARNING** messages because it could be > taken as a personal attack... (archives can prove that... <bg>) +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.