× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Are you using a v.35 interface or rs232?
Cjg

----Original Message-----
   >From:       "Jim Franz" <franz400@triad.rr.com>
   >To:                 <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com>
   >Subj:       Re: ACOM LINK/400
   >Reply To:           MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
   >Sent:       Tuesday, February 13, 2001 18:45
   >
   >don't know if you already got an answer.
   >5294 & 5494 are diff in the versions of the
   >sna pu level, and diff ru packet sizes (got
   >that from the '94 version of the AS/400 Handbook).
   >Even so, the various IBM 5250 devices worked
   >on both. I can remember several times non-IBM
   >vendors had chip ugrades to get them to work as
   >the faster remote equip came out. Have you tried
   >the 5494 in "5294 mode"? Just to see if that
   >works (at 19.2). Is this a true IBM 5494? Which
   >model? Model 1 & 2 had some differences.
   > hth - jim
   >
   >----- Original Message -----
   >From: "Steven McDonald" <mcdonald_sb@willis.com>
   >To: <midrange-l@midrange.com>
   >Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 10:18 AM
   >Subject: ACOM LINK/400
   >
   >
   >> I have a remote site that was on a 19.2 line using a 5294 controller for
   >> printing (Printers are HP 8100 Series) using the ACOM LINK/400 Controller
   >> for Twinax to Parrell connection.
   >>
   >> I switched to a 64 K line and a 5494 controller and the print in not
   >> working correctly.  I am either printing control characters or the forms
   >> are not printing at all or both.  The ACOM LINK/400 Controllers are on
   >Link
   >> Version of July 93.
   >>
   >> ACOM seems to believe that they will work with the new configuration.  I
   >> have tried slowing the line speed and packet size with no avail.
   >>
   >> Does anyone have a idea ?
   >>
   >> Thanks in Advance
   >>
   >> Steve
   >>
   >> +---
   >> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
   >> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
   >> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
   >> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to
   >MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
   >> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
   >david@midrange.com
   >> +---
   >
   >+---
   >| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
   >| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
   >| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
   >| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
   >| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: 
david@midrange.com
   >+---
   >


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.