Ed, >It may be possible to modify the logic as Doug suggests I wouldn't go so far as to say I "suggested" it. My main point was that you couldn't simply compare the entire return value. >but it would be >very difficult because the user-id and the password are used as a pair. One >is used to encrypt the other. In terms of being very difficult to make it work, that actually isn't true at least up through V4R5. I don't think it serves a useful purpose to describe the technique here though. At any rate, there is no guarantee it would continue to work beyond V4R5. In fact, I was surprised it *didn't* change at V4R5... Even though what you do need to compare (through V4R5) is "simple", the rest of the process was going around the block to cross the street. Unless you work for Rube Goldberg, the other alternatives mentioned are better. Doug +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: firstname.lastname@example.org +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.