|
My own experience of this was our 170 development machine. It came preloaded with the current version of OS400 (V4R3 at that time), and our sysadmin saved all user objects on our old box to be restored on the new. Some of the objects in qusrsys and qgpl were overwritten with backlevel versions. ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Subject: Re: Upgrade from V4R1 to V4R5 - Has anyone done this? Author: "tomh@simas.com" <SMTP:tomh@simas.com> at EXCHANGE Date: 11/24/00 4:36 PM I remember you telling us about some big-time problems you had doing this type of upgrade a few weeks ago. Did the problems turn out to be unrelated to the V4Rx -> V4R5 upgrade itself? If not, what was the gotcha? Just wanting to know, 'cuz I'm gonna be doing one myself in a few weeks... ========================================== At 12:27 PM 11/24/00 -0800, you wrote: I was wrong. Sorry Al >Dear Al, > >What is this "screw up" you warn about? I am also interested. > <SNIP> </SNIP> +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.