|
Dan, I've not researched this, but I recall reading some news story that Jacada has a tool that would take interactive jobs and convert them to client/server. The reason I remember this is that their product, unintentionally, meant that a site could acquire the less expensive server models. I'm sure that somewhere on the economic scale their product costs less than the IBM interactive penalty. D.BALE@handleman.com wrote: > > Regarding "interactive"... > <<snip>> > > *AND*, if I can convert all interactive tasks so that they become > non-interactive as far as the AS/400 is concerned (can't bring myself to call > it batch), does that happen to translate that I'd be able to get more overall > horsepower for less money, i.e., don't have to buy much interactive CPW? (Of > course, did I just increase my costs on the client side with more required > hardware and/or software?) > +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.