|
Regarding "interactive"... Please educate me (again?) on what does and what does not constitute interactive as far as a user using a display/keyboard/mouse (in other words, *not* what I consider a traditional "batch" job). I.e., is a Client/Server app considered to be an interactive task on the AS/400? Other examples? And, if I'm on the right path, is there a tool that converts a AS/400 green screen interactive task to a GUI of some sort and makes it a non-interactive task? *AND*, if I can convert all interactive tasks so that they become non-interactive as far as the AS/400 is concerned (can't bring myself to call it batch), does that happen to translate that I'd be able to get more overall horsepower for less money, i.e., don't have to buy much interactive CPW? (Of course, did I just increase my costs on the client side with more required hardware and/or software?) I thought I'd heard all this before, but it was rather moot in my previous environments. Now I'm in a shop that's considering a major upgrade, consolidating several AS/400s into one LPAR box. And so I wondered if this should be looked at before any decision is made. Dan Bale IT - AS/400 Handleman Company 248-362-4400 Ext. 4952 -------------------------- Original Message -------------------------- Marco- You wrote: >Hy i'm from Italy. >We're are deciding to buy a new as400 820 with 35 CPW of interactive and >370 CPW all. >We actually have a model 500/2141 that's a 30.6 CPW for Interactive and >Batch all together. >Our session (about 120) are interactive for the most. >Is it the right choice???? >How much is my actually interactive CPW??? There is an IBM web site http://www.as400.ibm.com/configure/Welcome.htm which includes a Workload Estimator that may be helpful. My informal approach would be to try to determine what percent of your current workload is interactive. If you have performance tools, then you can STRPFRMON for an hour during a busy period and collect data at 5-minute intervals. Then use the Performance Advisor to display the data you just collected, and it will show you the percent of CPU utilization for interactive jobs and for batch. If you're using 50% of your 30.6 CPW processor for interactive, you will need an Interactive Feature which is larger than 15.3 CPW plus your estimated growth requirements. If you don't have Performance Tools, then you can try to get an idea about interactive vs. batch workload from the WRKSYSSTS display. Just remember that if you look at a 10 minute period using WRKSYSSTS, any user who signs off or any batch job that completes before the 10 minutes are up won't be reflected in the total. Note: if your system performance is very bad now, this informal approach to system sizing won't work because you have no idea how much pent-up demand there is for system resources (work that just isn't getting done right now.) Dan Rothman, IBM iSeries 400 and AS/400 Specialist +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.