RE: The relevance of V3R2

["Gary R. Patterson" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Admittedly flawed "survey" methodology, at best.  And yes, I don't think (US
and Canadian - don't know about wider international markets) CISC shops are
spending much on any sort of AS/400 products or services, including
training.  I think it rather -reinforces- the point that CISC shops are not
spending money on AS/400 stuff.

I disagree, though, that this is a tough issue for software developers.  It
is a fairly simple economic decision:  Count up the revenue dollars from
CISC shops vs. the expenses of developing for and supporting them.  If it is
in the red, drop development and support and focus on newer, profitable
releases.

I'm curious, now: Who is out there making money from CISC shops?

Gary R. Patterson
NexSource, Inc.

Information technology services for business
http://www.nexsource.com



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com
[mailto:owner-midrange-l@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Chuck Lewis
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 10:01 AM
To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
Subject: Re: The relevance of V3R2


Gary R. Patterson wrote:

<---- BIG Snip ---->

<When I teach training classes, I usually ask the group what version they
use,
and I rarely get a CISC response (1 in 100, maybe?)  I don't doubt that
there are
CISC shops out there, but I don't know that they are spending any money on
new
software (or anything else AS/400-related, for that matter).>

INCLUDING training ? Not knocking what you are saying in ANY WAY Gary, but
this
could also skew your (admitedly non-scientific I'm SURE) survey ? :-) I
don't
envy software vendors wrestling with this problem !

Chuck

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---