Re: sending data from 400 to 400

["James W. Kilgore" <eMail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sam,

Look at the FTP PUT and MPUT subcommands.  This copies them straight
across without having to use a SAVF.

Although SAVOBJ *ALL, FTP, RSTOBJ *ALL sure is a whole lot less
keystrokes.  Since the size of your SAVF puts you in critical range, I
figure you are moving a -lot- of stuff.

Another option is forget trying to do it all in one SAVF and break apart
the transmission and installation into multiple SAVF's.

BTW, is there any housekeeping you can do on the machine to free up some
space?
Maybe reclaim spool storage? Clear library QRPLOBJ? CLROUTQ QEZJOBLOG?
RCLSTG?

Sam Kanakanui wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> In order to send objects(data, programs, etc.) from one AS/400 to another
> over a TCP/IP network, I am currently saving objects (or libraries) into a
> SAVF, FTPing them by TCP/IP address to the target 400, and then restoring
> them.  However, as the target machine is becoming more used, the SAVF being
> sent puts the target machine into critical storage problems before I can
> restore it to the target and delete the SAVF.  Can anyone show me a better
> way which does not utilize this SAVF and it's need for the extra space on
> the target machine?
>
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---