|
Check the size of journal receivers before the shorter and longer save times. If the receivers are bigger then it is taking longer to copy them to tape. Make sure that the journal receiver you are saving is detached before you start to save it. Check to see if you use more tape on the longer days than on the shorter days (DSPTAP). If the tape usage is the same then the system is doing more associated work. If the tape usage is higher, then it is taking longer because there is more data. The save time for a source file is very long compared to the save time for a single member file of the same size. Each member takes time similar to saving a file. If the long save includes a source file and the short saves don't include that file, well then, there you are. If you recently added disk drives and you didn't run Disk Balance to conclusion, I have another idea. As the system runs, all new objects will be allocated to the new drives - that's where most of the empty space is. After an IPL, the job temporary spaces are all gone so those drives are relatively empty. If you are saving to a save file, it will be allocated to the relatively empty space. If that empty space is on just a few disk drives, the save operations may overload the disk IOP or (possibly) the disk arms during the operation. I think you would need a very fast machine to overload the arms. If there are several concurrent save operations executing to save files on a relatively few disk arms and if those disk arms are all in one RAID set and the system is fast, overload is likely. If it isn't any of these and if this is important to you, please contact me offline. I can find it. If it isn't important to you, why worry? I assume that you have tested your backups to insure that you can restore your systems from any of them ... is it possible that the short ones don't have the same data as the longer ones? Richard Jackson mailto:richardjackson@richardjackson.net www.richardjacksonltd.com Voice: 1 (303) 808-8058 Fax: 1 (303) 663-4325 -----Original Message----- From: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com [mailto:owner-midrange-l@midrange.com]On Behalf Of oliver.wenzel@cibavision.Novartis.com Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2000 5:04 AM To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com Subject: AW: Why not IPL? (Was: RE: Long backup time after IPL) Hello, > 1) are you running 24/7? > 2) are you doing save while active? > 3) are you just saving changed objects? > 4) are you journaling? No, no, no and yes (partially). Our system is closed to users each night to do day-end processing and backups. The backup job in question runs mon-fri and the joblogs from each session are identical. Most of our data is backed up in two other jobs (about 40GB). So there's mostly static stuff in this backup. Regards, Oliver +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +--- +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.