Re: Change Management Software

[DAsmussen@xxxxxxx]

Ron,

In a message dated 2/25/00 10:09:40 AM Eastern Standard Time, RON@CPUMMS.COM 
writes:

> Well, everytime I get a question about response, I do a work active job. 
> Guess what tops the list of cpu percentage? And if I have two programmers 
> promoting source at the same time, each gets around 20% of cpu. That's 40% 
> for two, 60% for three... You get the idea (we have over 30 programmers.) 
> When I have my programming manager call for support on the issue, he gets 
> nowhere. They finally helped some (after three weeks) on a wise desk 
resource 
> problem that was taking over 80% of cpu any time a user filtered their call 
> list. I would definitely call this a resource pig.

Number one, it sounds like you're using copy source, compile object instead 
of copy source, move object.  The latter is _FAR_ less intense.  Number two, 
TurnOver (like _any_ intense application) should be put it its own memory 
pool so that other users aren't affected.  If resource utilization is your 
primary reason for scrapping TurnOver, I seriously doubt that you'll be happy 
with anything else, either.

Regards!

Dean Asmussen
Enterprise Systems Consulting, Inc.
Fuquay-Varina, NC  USA
E-mail:  DAsmussen@aol.com

"Nothing is so embarrassing as watching someone do something you said could 
not be done."  -- Sam Ewing
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---