• Subject: Re: Why MI? (Was: MI programmers list? Interested?)
  • From: Jim Langston <jlangston@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 09 Nov 1999 07:59:11 -0800
  • Organization: Conex Global Logistics Services, Inc.

Okay, Hans, then what would you encourage to use in place of
C for shops that do not have C?  Nor will ever get C?  Nor will
ever even think about getting C.

If IBM is willing to give me C free on my AS/400, then I will gladly
accept it and use it.  But we all know this just ain't gonna happen <g>

I also know that my boss is not going to pay the exorbitant prices IBM
wants for the compiler to do something that could be done in other
ways, such as by using API's or MI.

A screwdriver may be a lot better for putting in screws, but if the Screwdriver
costs me $5000 watch me hit those screws.


Jim Langston

boldt@ca.ibm.com wrote:

> <SNIP>
> I've always believed in using the appropriate tool for
> the task at hand.  To me, for most of the reasons people
> use MI, C is the more appropriate tool.
> <SNIP>

| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2020 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].