|
Booth,
Maybe some of us are having trouble getting too
excited because a few clunky radio buttons on a 80 or 132 column screen does not
a GUI make. I'd be hard pressed to believe that (as currently
implemented) they make an application any easier to use, and they certainly
don't give a tired old terminal a sexy new look. These things are an answer to a problem that
doesn't exist. My users aren't asking for radio buttons and menu bars on a
terminal screen. What are they asking for?
They are asking for a GUI - a complete GUI. One
that provides the following features:
1) Colour - Lots of it, used intelligently to draw
attention to different information.
2) More data for each screen. Eighty
columns doesn't cut it. And just try to effectively use 132 columns
displays in a CA/400 emulation session - it looks horrible.
3) Rich text fields that allow them to emphasize
their text.
And on, and on, and on.... limited time prevents me
from continuing. But these few examples should serve to illustrate some of the
elements of a GUI that actually help the user in any significant way. Radio
boxes, menu bars etc., are nice touches, but they don't allow you to really do
anything that you can't already accomplish using existing
techniques.
Solving any of these problems would require
significant resources, and I don't think that I would like to see IBM wasting
any more time on it. I think that they should continue to focus on the more
modern tools instead.
Regards,
John Taylor
----- Original Message -----
|
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.