|
Nina, >it was true. it would run, but very badly. one of our clients had one >of those machines as an early as/400 install (october 1988), and it was >one of the worst weeks of my life. they'd gone from a 34 to a new >as/400 and the response was even worse. Like Lou, my recollection is that it was not *that* bad. At the time I worked for a business partner that got a B10 with 4MB main storage and 945MB disk (all three disks!) in about Sep-Oct '88. I certainly don't remember ever having problems IPL'ing reliably. It did improve quite a bit when bumped to 8MB. But during that early period the machine was not used real heavily for production work. Compiles did take awhile, but we were used to that. :( It could also be our perception of slow was warped because we had so many customers with 5364's (shudder!) and other speed demons. Doug +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.