RE: Client Access problem

If it is the host file, you could also try deleting the session definition
and create a new session definition using the ip address of the host as the
host name rather than the system value.  It seemed to work for the guy next
door to me.  The host file solution has the advantage of making the ip
address less obvious than it could be.  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Howard Weatherly [mailto:hweatherly@dlis.dla.mil]
> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 1999 11:04 AM
> To: AS400@ctg.com; MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> Subject: Client Access problem
> 
> 
> Hi folks,     
> 
> We have a situation where one of our clients was running CA 
> under Win95
> just fine but her machine was retired and a new one with WIN98 was
> installed. Now we can verify the connection and in fact connect to the
> AS400  but as soon as we try to configure a session, we get a 
> (lightning
> bolt) 697 {or some such number}.
> 
> Additionally, the version of CA on the 400 is for WIN95 or NT.
> 
> My questions:
> 
> Is there anyone running CA under WIN98 with V4R2M0 on the 400?
> Did you need to load any specific PTF's? 
> Any not so obvious gotchas involved?
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to 
> MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: 
> david@midrange.com
> +---
> 
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---