Re: Level 40 security issues

Many thanks to all who responded to my level 40 security concerns.  I have 
passed
information on to appropriate personnel who may be contacting you.

Cynthia M. Kovarik wrote:

> I am being told that IBM's Client Access has more security issues than
> NetSoft with regards to 32-bit openness (ex. Client Access using
> proprietary ports for TCP/IP, etc.).  Is this true?
>
> Also, information from PentaSafe has been sent my way.  While I do not
> doubt that they have very good modules for auditing and security, their
> price tag is a bit hefty for a small shop.  What are others using for
> AS/400 auditing and security (for the latter, specifically exit points
> for FTP, etc.).
>
> TIA
>
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
> +---



+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---