Re: Level 10 Security

[Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>]

Lou,

Your initial letter led me to believe that your question was 'Why should I move 
from 
level 10?'.  I see now that your argument is that you see no need for your 
company to 
change from level 10 and you detest being 'forced' to.  I can accept your 
argument.  
Your company should have that right.

However I would question doing business with a company that runs at level 10.






sspi@ix.netcom.com on 04/08/99 10:18:45 PM
Please respond to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com@Internet
To:     MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com@Internet
cc:      

Subject:        Re: Level 10 Security

   The purpose of my message was not to advocate any specific security
level, but to comment on IBM's policy of removing a feature, ostensibly for
my own "protection".

   Your position is obviously that Level 10 is never appropriate, since you
support it's removal.  My position is that you have no idea what is
appropriate for my business.  I certainly would not support the removal of
system values just because *I* don't use them.  If I did, we could remove
well over half of them.

   Regards,

   - Lou Forlini
     Software Engineer
     System Support Products, Inc.
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---