× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: IBM pushing Java
  • From: email@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (James W Kilgore)
  • Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 12:31:06 -0800
  • Organization: Progressive Data Systems, Inc.

Balaji,

You are correct.  All too often people mistake being busy with being
productive.

With proper mentoring, and the appropriate review/reward systems in
place, a new programmer can be shown that time spent -not- reinventing
the wheel can make them a hero by having sound products, on time, within
budget.

Now to take this thread back to JAVA in particular, IBM has been
endeavoring to create class objects to be used within your
applications.  This "frame work" is to address issues like "name and
address" object discussed earlier.

IMO, learning which objects exist, and how to use them, is no more
complex than learning which opcodes exist or which commands exist, and
using them.

Certainly we did not all sit down at an AS/400 and start programming
WITHOUT learning what was available for use.  It is on the shoulders of
the shop to include any extensions to the base OS delivered functions to
make them readily known.

It is on the shoulders of the programmer to learn and use them.

James W. Kilgore
email@James-W-Kilgore.com

P.S. BTW, I'm not a proponent of IBM written applications, utilities and
OS yes, applications, no.  Progressive Data Systems, Inc. has made a
very good living for 22 years beating the socks off of IBM in the
application arena.  I take IBM's efforts in the JAVA class creation with
a grain of salt.  IBM has historically gotten in/out of the application
market as it suited their purpose for hardware sales, but this effort is
a good attempt at giving application providers a "leg up" on class
creation.




Balaji Venkataraman/commsoft wrote:
  Usually the newer/younger programmer are more interested in
> cranking out more code faster - they dont like to spend that extra bit of
> time searching for existing objects.
>
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.