• Subject: Re: Inactive Time Out
  • From: "Dennis Lovelady" <dennis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 16:40:33 -0500

The problem I saw with QINACTITV, back when I tried to use it, was that messages were issued for each job, not once, but each time the timer expired, with no indication of how long that particular job had been inactive.  I found it a nuisance.  But your mileage may vary.
Dennis Lovelady                    Simpsonville, SC
mail: dennis@lovelady.com
URL:  http://lovelady.piedmont.net
ICQ:  5734860
"When science discovers the center of the universe a lot of people will be disappointed to find they are not it."
        - Bernard Baily
-----Original Message-----
From: Al Barsa, Jr. <barsa2@ibm.net>
To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com>
Date: Wednesday, March 17, 1999 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: Inactive Time Out

At 11:44 AM 3/17/99 +0000, you wrote:
>Does anyone know if it it is possible to override QINACTITV by user or
>group or some other method.
Create a message queue to get the messages, and change the system value for QINACTMSGQ to that message queue. Then you can hang a message handling program in that message queue, and decide by user, workstation, or whatever scheme seems reasonable.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].