|
Lurton, Not to refute your decision, just tossing in my 2 cents.... Lurton Keel wrote: > <<snip>> This was a big deal since we > got a 24X7 monitored frame relay network for less money than 2 of the VPN > quotes. Here in the Pacific NW, a 56k frame only guarantees 28.8 Frame installation is $1,000 at each end. Basic 2 channel, with a POTS, ISDN is $125 install and, well it 2 channels at 64k, period. The POTS can work as a single FAX/Voice line. The per month charge is comparable. > 3 Managing the network is a real pill if you are having response time > problems over the Internet. With our frame relay network, we have abilities > to monitor network traffic and reconfigure on the fly. Lucent's NetCare > center in Tampa is watching our network even while I am asleep This may be symptomatic of using a frame relay service. ISDN has consistent throughput. How much per month does Lucent charge to "watch" your line/their service? > 4 We needed redundancy for our stores. With the frame network we have > automatic dial backup into our LAN. The users don't even know it happens. > With VPN we would have to have 2 paths active all of the time or at least an > account with 2 different ISP's with a dial up solution. The ISDN/POTS would provide a dialup backup at no additional cost. Personally, the POTS that comes with ISDN is, at best 9.6k and best suited for fax/voice. Just about any and all ISP's offer 56k dialup for $19.95/month. Now that's cheap insurance. > 5 Security was an issue a year ago. I think IBM and others have done > a great job of making VPN a viable alternative, in some cases, by removing > the security issue. Alternative to what? VPN are as tappable as any communication line. Locks keep honest people honest. If they want in, they'll get in. Get over it. > 6 Control of network structure. We control the IP addresses, we don't > use public IP addresses. We don't have to worry about firewalls (except on > the back side of the WAN to provide email and Internet access to our > clients). Now that's a no brainer. Your internal IP address is always hidden from public view under any router/gateway. This is not a plus provided exclusively by your choice. Sorry, don't mean to be harsh, but this is a given. > 7 With our network, we can prioritize traffic. Telnet has first > priority, SMTP second and HTML last. This keeps our pipes open for business > traffic and doesn't clutter the bandwidth with people browsing the WWW. Sure you can prioritize, but what about the 20 hops in between? > 8 There are about 50 more reasons but I am getting tired of typing. You just gave me 50 more reasons to stay awake! :-) Regards, James W. Kilgore email@James-W-Kilgore.com +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.