|
There's not much you can do, if optimizer chooses to build access paths - for big files it takes time. The key to this problem is to understand why optimizer wants an access path of it own. Run your query in debug mode and look at optimizer messages in a joblog - there could be a clue. You cannot tell optimizer what to do, but you can influence its decision indirectly - for example, ordering on specific keys may force optimizr to choose existing access path. There are some query parameters you can tweak, also you may try to reformulate your query with the same result, using your knowledge of data semantics. Another approach is to try to speed up access path builds - on AS/400 there are some parallel query features which can improve this process, depending on spare processing power you may have on your system. You may send me more information (offline) and I will have a look if smth can be done: query definition, PFs and LFs definitions, query joblog in debug mode. Best regards Alexey Pytel Gopi Krishna <gkrishna@starbucks.com> on 02/23/99 09:41:50 AM Please respond to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com To: "'midrange-l@midrange.com'" <midrange-l@midrange.com> cc: (bcc: Alexei Pytel/Rochester/IBM) Subject: Query Optimizer We are experiencing problems with Query Optimizer. Here is the problem. We are joining to big PFs with over 14 millions records (size >4GB each). We have lots of LFs on these 2 PFs. After defining the query, when we try to save the definition and select opiton 2 to run in Batch, it takes atleast 20 minutes to save the definition & submit it to the batch. I know why its happening. Its Building an Access Path. Even though we have Access paths that could be used, Optimizer is not using. While the Query/400 is saving the definition if I try to browse one of the files used in the query through EZVIEW (DB tool) it doesn't allow me to get it, because the file is locked (but it never gives lock msg). Even if we run interactive jobs (Payroll) using one of these 2 files, samething happen and the job is hanging until the query save is complete. During this lock, If do SYS REQ 3 and try to run option 11 (Program Stack), it takes longtime before it displays the empty stack. I contacted IBM, they have not solution to this. They are asking to purge these files. We don't want to do this. So they asked us to increase the Access Path Size to 1TB for the PFs/LFs. Since the PF is not keyed I can't increase it for PFs but I did for LFs. No improvement. Any idea what could be done to fix this problem? Thanks Gopi Krishna :-) +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +--- +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.