|
Simon, No, you are not the only one who turns down work/money if the customer or project is suspect. I've even noted a couple of times when you run into this situation it is to your benefit to have a competitor win the bid. Let's see: a customer who constantly wants something for nothing, a poor design that has you receiving phone calls at all hours of the day or night or such a costly project that your reputation will be damaged. Learning & teaching are reciprocal in this profession. They learn a little more about computers and I've learned more about manufacturing explosives then I probably should know. ;-) James W. Kilgore email@James-W-Kilgore.com Simon Coulter wrote: > Hello Booth, Nina, James, Doug, Don, John, and possibly sundry others: > > Well this was originally an off-topic aside but it has become more relevant. >I am now curious. First some > comments about the comments: > > James wrote: > >How about: "money talks"? ;-) > >They have it, you want it. > > Yes, I want other peoples money. It's necessary to my survival but I do not >have to compromise to get it. > > John wrote: > >Customer hasn't paid $$$ yet ? :) > > Facetious argument. If I have performed the work satisfactorily they are >contractually obliged to pay. > > Booth wrote: > >My personal assessment Simon is that the customer is always right. This can >be demonstrated simply by doing > >the exercise of proving him wrong. Once the customer is proven wrong it is >but a trivial task to > >demonstrate the customer is now in the group called "ex-customer" and can >know longer be called a customer. > >qed, the customer is never wrong. > > No, even one as abrasive as I can explain to a customer why they are wrong >without losing them as a customer. > Anyone that touchy is someone I wouldn't WANT to work for. Nor someone who >constantly requires obsequious > behaviour. > > Nina wrote: > >i've seen that happen more than once. no one likes to be proven wrong! and >sometimes it's the way you do > >it. no one likes a know it all. > > >the best you can do is gently suggest - and if they say no, you can decide >whether you want to code in a > >style you don't like, or don't take the job at all. > > I agree with this. The customer is paying me for my technical ability. If >they cannot accept my advice then > why would I consider the job? If they can persuade me I am wrong then I've >learned something. Being proven > wrong is a learning experience. It is not possible to be right all the time >-- even for me; I thought I was > wrong once but I was mistaken (hee hee hee). (By the way there are two shift >keys within easy reach of your > pinky fingers :) ) > > Don wrote: > >Actually, there's a corollary to that law: > > >How many NEW UNITS will I sell if I add feature x. Which really should be > >written to be: How many units will I LOSE if I DON'T add feature > >x...because my competition has HAD feature x as a base or affordable add > >on function for some time....:) > > Isn't that marketing survival? If your product can't fill as many check >boxes of an RFP you might not get a > chance to bid. > > Doug wrote: > >It's called the "Golden Rule"; otherwise known as, "He who has the gold, >makes the rules". > > Again, I don't have to put up with crap from a customer just 'cause they have >the dollars. > > Now to satisfying my curiosity -- if you'll indulge me. Am I the only >independent/contractor/consultant who > turns down work because the customer is an idiot, the project is doomed, the >platform (hardware/OS) is > horrible, the work isn't interesting or challenging? > > I know of contractors who really don't care what they are asked to do or how >they have to do it as long as > they get paid. I can't work that way so I don't -- it's one of the reasons I >stay away from application > coding. > > Regards, > Simon Coulter. > > «»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«» > «» FlyByNight Software AS/400 Technical Specialists «» > «» Eclipse the competition - run your business on an IBM AS/400. «» > «» «» > «» Phone: +61 3 9419 0175 Mobile: +61 0411 091 400 «» > «» Fax: +61 3 9419 0175 mailto: shc@flybynight.com.au «» > «» «» > «» Windoze should not be open at Warp speed. «» > «»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«»«» > +--- > | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! > | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. > | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. > | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. > | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com > +--- +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.