Re: Batch Job(s)

[John Earl <johnearl@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Doug Barnes wrote:

> Which would be more efficient A or B?
> A - 3 "batch" subsystems using a shared memory pool. Each SBSD with one JOBQ.
>
> B - 1 "batch" subsystem with 3 JOBQs associated with it using same shared
> memory pool.
>
> Both scenarios would have MAXACT set to 1 for each JOBQ.

As long as they are both using the same shared memory pool, their would not be
any differences in efficiency.  If you wanted to be able to control the
subsystems separately, then I would use three subsystems.   If you wanted to 
keep
things simple, then just use one.

jte




>
>
> - Doug Barnes -
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
> +---



--
John Earl   johnearl@toolnet.com

PowerTech Toolworks  206-575-0711
PowerLock Network Security www.toolnet.com
The 400 School   www.400school.com
--


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---