RE: WRKACTJOB leaving part of itself running?

["Pytel, Alexei" <pytela1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I believe WRKACTJOB sets aside current counters in an invisible object,
associated with a job, to provide for continuity in statistics.
Other than that nothing - at least no tasks running.

    Best regards,

          Alexei Pytel



> -----Original Message-----
> From: awarren@ottaway.com [SMTP:awarren@ottaway.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 1998 7:30 PM
> To:   'midrange-l@midrange.com'
> Subject:      WRKACTJOB leaving part of itself running?
> 
> I'd like to prove or disprove a persistent "AS/400 legend":
> 
> If you WRKACTJOB, then exit the function but remain signed
> on, are any system resources used? Is there any part of 
> WRKACTJOB
> that remains running even though you are no longer in the 
> command?
> 
> Andy Warren
> Ottaway Newspapers MIS
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to
> MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
> david@midrange.com
> +---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---