RE: WRKACTJOB leaving part of itself running?

["Fisher, Don" <DRF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes.  You may notice if you enter the command again that the "Elapsed Time"
field is equal to the amount of time since the command was first entered.
The system continues to gather information regarding system usage during the
time you are not viewing the screen.  It would otherwise have no way of
knowing the "CPU %" of a job during the time elapsed.

I would, however, be curious to know how much this "backround" process
requires from the system.  Any thoughts?

Donald R. Fisher, III
Senior Programmer/Analyst
Heilig-Meyers Furniture Company
(804) 785-7500 ext. 2124

> -----Original Message-----
> From: awarren@ottaway.com [SMTP:awarren@ottaway.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 1998 2:30 PM
> To:   'midrange-l@midrange.com'
> Subject:      WRKACTJOB leaving part of itself running?
> 
> I'd like to prove or disprove a persistent "AS/400 legend":
> 
> If you WRKACTJOB, then exit the function but remain signed
> on, are any system resources used? Is there any part of 
> WRKACTJOB
> that remains running even though you are no longer in the 
> command?
> 
> Andy Warren
> Ottaway Newspapers MIS
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to
> MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
> david@midrange.com
> +---

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---