|
I'll be interested in the view of others. I have been through the exercise of screen fields differing from file fields, and at the moment I am finding that naming the file and the screen fields the same to be really a lot clearer and simpler from every angle. So much easier in fact that I am worried I have overlooked some great toadstool of a problem. In <000a01be0128$9a1464e0$3264a8c0@magnuson>, on 10/26/98 at 03:35 PM, "Gerald Magnuson" <magnuson@ksni.net> said: >But again, if these programs were properly designed (I.e. independent >routines for >each screen and its editing and updating) the "windowing" would be fine. >My feeling is that you should have unique field names on the screen for >clarity sake. >More work up front, easier to maintain 3 months later. -- ----------------------------------------------------------- boothm@ibm.net Booth Martin ----------------------------------------------------------- +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.